FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – October 28, 2020
Michelle Rash, email@example.com
Rich Robinson, firstname.lastname@example.org
DURHAM, N.C. — In a 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has upheld a lower court ruling that allows North Carolina voters who make an error on their mail-in ballot to receive notice of the mistake and have an opportunity to fix it, as well as extending the deadline for receipt of absentee ballots. This critical ruling will help ensure potentially thousands of ballots are counted in this year’s critical General Election.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett did not participate in the case.
The Supreme Court upheld a ruling initially issued on Oct. 14 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina on three cases related to the processing of mail-in absentee ballots. Under the rulings, voters who cast their ballots by mail will be able to correct the following errors on the ballot envelope without having their ballot spoiled and starting anew:
Voter did not sign the voter certification
Voter signed in the wrong place
Witness or assistant did not print name alongside signature
Witness or assistant did not print address
Witness or assistant signed on the wrong line
Ballot envelopes missing a witness signature will still be spoiled (not counted), although voters will receive notice and be able to cast a new ballot. While mail-in ballots must be postmarked by Nov. 3, the deadline for county boards of elections to receive them has been extended to Nov. 12, a decision that was also upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court after being challenged in lower courts.
This ruling ends a months-long legal battle over how North Carolina would handle voting during a pandemic.
In late May, Democracy North Carolina, the League of Women Voters of North Carolina and several individual voters filed a federal lawsuit (Democracy North Carolina v. North Carolina State Board of Elections) asking for additional protections for the health and safety of voters, including the ability to correct simple errors on mail-in ballots, a process known as curing. In August, Judge William Osteen in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, issued a preliminary injunction requiring a cure process and ordering the North Carolina State Board of Elections (NCSBOE) to issue guidance to county boards of elections on handling that process.
Late this summer, a separate lawsuit with many of the same claims as Democracy North Carolina v. North Carolina State Board of Elections was filed in state court. In its settlement of that suit in late September, the NCSBOE issued additional guidance on the cure process, including extending the deadline for receiving mail-in ballots.
A few days later, on Sept. 26, two lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina — Wise v. Circosta and Moore v. Circosta — challenging the new cure process issued by the NCSBOE. On Oct. 14, Osteen upheld all the cure process, with the sole exception of the ability to cure ballots that were missing a witness signature, as well as kept in place the extended deadline for mail-in ballots to be received.
The plaintiffs in Wise v. Circosta and Moore v. Circosta appealed to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which upheld Osteen’s order in a 12-3 en banc ruling. The plaintiffs in both cases then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The plaintiffs in Democracy North Carolina v. North Carolina State Board of Elections filed a brief of amici curiae in the case, arguing that any decision made by the Supreme Court should uphold the cure process originally granted in that case in August. The plaintiffs in Democracy North Carolina v. North Carolina State Board of Elections are represented by the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, Fair Elections Center and pro bono counsel from law firm WilmerHale.
“With under a week until Election Day, we are glad that North Carolina voters who have decided to vote by mail now have the assurance that their votes will be counted as long as they are received by Nov. 12,” said Allison Riggs, chief Voting Rights counsel and interim executive director for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice. “Just as importantly, now that this issue has been resolved, county boards of elections can now continue the important process of helping voters address potential issues, so these ballots can be counted quickly and accurately.”
“Tonight's decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is an unmitigated victory for North Carolina voters. It rejects a completely unfounded attack on the absentee ballot cure procedure that a federal judge ordered months ago and declines to up-end settled constitutional law, which would have injected chaos into the election,” said Jon Sherman, senior counsel for Fair Elections Center. “Thousands of North Carolina voters have already cured minor defects with their absentee ballots so their votes will count, and thousands more will do so. The integrity of our elections are protected when voters' rights are protected.”
In North Carolina, approximately 827,000 mail-in ballots have been received through Oct. 27. An estimated 98.6 percent of those ballots have been accepted, including at least 3,400 which have already been cured. More than 6,500 ballots have been identified as having potential issues that voters may have the chance to correct.
# # #
The Southern Coalition for Social Justice, founded in 2007, partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities in the South to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights through the combination of legal advocacy, research, organizing and communications. Learn more at southerncoalition.org and follow our work on Twitter and Facebook.
Fair Elections Center is a national nonpartisan and non-profit voting rights and election reform organization based in Washington, DC whose mission is to use litigation, public education and advocacy to remove barriers to registration and voting, and to improve election administration.
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (WilmerHale) provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas that are critical to the success of its clients. The law firm’s leading Intellectual Property, Litigation/Controversy, Regulatory and Government Affairs, Securities, and Transactional Departments participate in some of the highest-profile legal and policy matters. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is renowned as a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 13 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. For more information, please visit www.wilmerhale.com.